This scenario of a full swing-state sweep would replicate some dynamics observed in the 2016 election, where polling errors were widely correlated. In 2016, Trump exceeded expectations across nearly every swing state except Nevada. This underestimation was partly due to pollsters not adjusting results based on education level, a critical predictor that year. Consequently, Trump carried states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, defying forecasts and tilting the election sharply in his favour.
Related Posts
Kumar continued to ignore …; lines in Infosys vs Cognizant lawsuit naming CEO
- Bharat Tezz
- February 21, 2025
- 0
The legal battle between Infosys and Cognizant has intensified as Cognizant accuses Infosys of stealing trade secrets related to its TriZetto software. Infosys counters, alleging […]
‘Democracy too precious’: Congress pushes for paper ballots
Congress MP Manish Tewari urges the Election Commission of India to consider reverting to paper ballots, emphasizing democracy’s value over technology. This follows ECI’s rejection […]
‘Nothing unfair about Sarfaraz Khan situation’
Despite an impressive Test debut against England, Sarfaraz Khan awaits a spot in India’s playing XI. Former selector Jatin Paranjape emphasizes the competition for batting […]