The bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma emphasised that phrases like “with intent to strike terror” and “by any other means of whatever nature to cause or likely to cause” in the UAPA definition reflect the statute’s preventive intent.
Related Posts
China Anchors ‘Monster Ship’ In South China Sea, Philippine Coast Guard Says | News18 | N18G
The Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) said on Saturday that China’s largest coastguard vessel has anchored in Manila’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the South China […]
UP BJP Worker Shoots At Wife On Suspicion Of Affair, Kills Three Children In Saharanpur; Arrested
The accused was infuriated with his wife having an affair. Despite him trying to persuade her, she continued having the affair. This infuriated Yogesh Rohilla, […]
CM Stalin Objects, Governor RN Ravi Defends: Hindi Month Sparks Fresh Language Row In Tamil Nadu
Ravi said that he has observed a growing enthusiasm among the people of Tamil Nadu to learn Hindi in recent years