The bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma emphasised that phrases like “with intent to strike terror” and “by any other means of whatever nature to cause or likely to cause” in the UAPA definition reflect the statute’s preventive intent.
Related Posts
Disha Patani Making Joggers The Trend To Follow! | Bollywood | N18S | #shortvideos | #viralvideos
n18oc_shorts News18 Mobile App – https://onelink.to/desc-youtube
Tamannaah Bhatia Ditches Makeup As She Steps Out For A Dinner Date With Vijay Varma & Friends; WATCH
Tamannaah Bhatia decided to step out sans makeup for a special date night with her gang and boyfriend Vijay Varma. She looked pretty as a […]
Will Shashi Tharoor Join BJP? Will He Remarry? Congress Leader Ends Curiosity
On joining BJP, Shashi Tharoor said it is not right to join other party if you can’t embrace their belief. But there is always an […]