The bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma emphasised that phrases like “with intent to strike terror” and “by any other means of whatever nature to cause or likely to cause” in the UAPA definition reflect the statute’s preventive intent.
Related Posts
UP Woman Kills Husband With Lover’s Help, Cops Cite Tension Over Rape Case As Motive
Apart from the affair, their motive is also believed to be the husband’s reluctance to pursue a case of the woman’s alleged gang rape, police […]
‘Possibility Of Involvement Of Public Servants’: DRI Briefs CBI In Ranya Rao Gold Smuggling Case
CNN-News18 accessed a statement given by Constable Basavaraj to the DRI, revealing that DGP Ramachandra Rao, Ranya Rao’s stepfather, had instructed him to provide protocol […]
Folk Song Performed By Patna Girls In State Art Festival Win Hearts
Over 1500 individuals from 38 districts participated in the three-day art festival at Gandhi Maidan in Bihar’s Lakhisarai district