The bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma emphasised that phrases like “with intent to strike terror” and “by any other means of whatever nature to cause or likely to cause” in the UAPA definition reflect the statute’s preventive intent.
Related Posts
Betrayal and Backlash: How Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s Marriage to Rattanbai Shook The Parsi Community
Rattanbai, regarded as a jewel of the Parsi community, faced backlash for her decision to marry Jinnah, who was 24 years her senior and an […]
Supreme Court To Hear AIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi’s Plea On Places Of Worship Law
Owaisi, in his plea, has sought a direction to the Centre to ensure effective implementation of the law, said his counsel.
A Medicine Alternative To Blinkit, Zepto: Apollo Healthcare CEO Discusses Expansion Of 19-Minute Delivery Model
The company is working to make the availability of medicines in both acute and chronic cases faster and currently, in Delhi-NCR, 48 per cent orders […]