The bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma emphasised that phrases like “with intent to strike terror” and “by any other means of whatever nature to cause or likely to cause” in the UAPA definition reflect the statute’s preventive intent.
Related Posts
Chhath Puja 2024: Sandhya Arghya Sunset Timings In Delhi, Mumbai, Patna, Ranchi & Other Cities
Chhath Puja 2024: Check out the exact sunset timings for Sandhya Arghya in Delhi, Mumbai, Patna, Ranchi, Kolkata, and other major cities.
Supreme Court Slams Samay Raina’s Comment On The Legal Proceedings In Canada Over India’s Got Latent
| Youngsters are over smart: Supreme Court slams Samay Raina’s comment on the legal proceedings in Canada over India’s Got Latent Row n18oc_breaking-newsNews18 Mobile App […]
Union Budget 2025: NDA Hails Budget As ‘Growth-Oriented’, Opposition Calls It ‘Anti-Farmer’
Union Budget 2025: The Opposition has slammed the Budget 2025 for being Bihar-centric and ignoring key issues like MSP for farmers, while the BJP praised […]