DU on February 11 argued that it held the information in a fiduciary capacity and “mere curiosity” in the absence of public interest did not entitle anyone to seek private information under RTI law
Related Posts
J-K: Three More Separatist Groups Quit Hurriyat, Shah says ‘Modi Ji’s Vision For United Bharat Bolstered’
- Bharat Tezz
- April 8, 2025
- 0
Jammu Kashmir Islamic Political Party, Jammu and Kashmir Muslim Democratic League, and Kashmir Freedom Front disassociated themselves from the Hurriyat.
Shillong Sunday Teer Results, 1 December, 2024 LIVE: Check Winning Numbers For First And Second Rounds
Shillong Sunday Teer Result Today, 1 December, 2024 LIVE UPDATES. Check full list of common and winning numbers for Shillong Sunday Morning Teer and Shillong […]
#DelhiElection2025: Manish Sisodia Casts His Vote | #trending | N18S
- Bharat Tezz
- February 5, 2025
- 0
| AAP leader and MLA candidate from Jangpura, Manish Sisodia, casts his vote at Lady Irwin Senior Secondary School in New Delhi. n18oc_shortsNews18 Mobile App […]