DU on February 11 argued that it held the information in a fiduciary capacity and “mere curiosity” in the absence of public interest did not entitle anyone to seek private information under RTI law
Related Posts
36 Years, 45 Accused, Not 1 Found Guilty: How the 1988 Roop Kanwar Sati Case Ended in Court Now
Acquitting all accused this week, a Rajasthan court said the police officers who registered the case and the witnesses who appeared during the investigation failed […]
Howrah Woman Forces Husband To Sell Kidney For Rs 10 Lakh, Elopes With Lover And The Money
- Bharat Tezz
- February 1, 2025
- 0
The man filed a police complaint, but the wife refused to return, stating she would send a divorce letter
Reagan Airport Plane Crash: Rescue Ops Underway In Potomac River | DC Plane Crash Updates | N18G
- Bharat Tezz
- January 30, 2025
- 0
Several fireboats were on the scene as the rescue operations were underway, according to the Washington Fire Department, Reuters said.According to Fox News, American Airlines […]