DU on February 11 argued that it held the information in a fiduciary capacity and “mere curiosity” in the absence of public interest did not entitle anyone to seek private information under RTI law
Related Posts
Delhi Weather: Record February Heat Signals How Next 3-4 Months Will Be
Delhi hit a record 34.1°C on February 26, signaling a tough summer ahead. The capital faces a growing risk of rising temperatures and potential heatwaves […]
Supreme Court Imposes Rs 50,000 Cost On Centre For Denying Pension To J&K Soldier’s Widow
A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih dismissed the appeal filed by the Centre against the order of the Armed Forces […]
Prince Harry Wins Legal Battle Against Rupert Murdoch’s UK Newspaper | N18G
Prince Harry claimed a monumental legal win over Rupert Murdoch’s UK newspaper group after they issued an apology for invading his privacy for more than […]