DU on February 11 argued that it held the information in a fiduciary capacity and “mere curiosity” in the absence of public interest did not entitle anyone to seek private information under RTI law
Related Posts
Fresh Snowfall Blankets The Serene Valleys Of Kashmir, Turning Kashmir Into A Winter Wonderland N18S
- Bharat Tezz
- January 16, 2025
- 0
Fresh Snowfall Blankets The Serene Valleys Of Kashmir, Turning Kashmir Into A Winter Wonderland N18S n18oc_shortsNews18 Mobile App – https://onelink.to/desc-youtube
Telangana Bride And Groom Protest Against Revanth Reddy At Wedding Over Unfulfilled Promise
- Bharat Tezz
- April 14, 2025
- 0
A newlywed couple from Mukhra (K) village protested at their wedding, demanding Telangana CM Revanth Reddy fulfill his promise of 1 tola gold for brides, […]
Elphinstone Bridge To Remain Closed From April 10, Mumbai Traffic Police Issue Advisory: Check Alternative Routes
- Bharat Tezz
- April 10, 2025
- 0
Mumbai Traffic Advisory: Due to the closure of Mumbai’s Elphinstone Bridge for two years, many traffic diversions will be in place in west and east […]