The Centre argued that X had misinterpreted key provisions of the IT Act, particularly the distinctions between Section 69A and Section 79(3)(b).
Related Posts
‘Parliament, Delhi Airport Would Have Been Waqf Properties If…’: Rijiju Tables Waqf Bill In Lok Sabha
In the Lok Sabha, Kiren Rijiju stated that without the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, landmarks like the Parliament building and Delhi airport would have been designated […]
Bad Timing: Scammers Target Indore Crime Branch Chief For Digital Arrest During Press Briefing To Pull Off ‘Digital Arrest’
The target, Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police (ADCP) of Indore crime branch Rajesh Dandotia, was in his office when he received an automated call over […]
Meerut Woman Married To Pakistani Sent Back From Wagah Border For Holding Indian Passport
Sana had arrived in India with her two children on a 45-day visa, but when she visited the Wagah border on April 24, she was […]