The bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma emphasised that phrases like “with intent to strike terror” and “by any other means of whatever nature to cause or likely to cause” in the UAPA definition reflect the statute’s preventive intent.
Related Posts
‘May Everyone Prosper…’: PM Modi, Amit Shah Extend Diwali Greetings
PM Narendra Modi extended best wishes to the people of the country on the occasion of Diwali on Thursday.
Strategic Bilaspur–Manali–Leh Rail Line Completes DPR Stage; To Cost Rs 1.31 Lakh Crore: Railways
The Bilaspur-Manali-Leh (489 km) alignment starts from Beri and passes through major towns including Sundernagar, Mandi, Manali, Sissu, Darcha, Keylong, Sarchu, Pang, Rumtse, Upshi, and […]
Nod To Caste Census May Make Karnataka 4th State To Cross Supreme Court’s 50% Quota ‘Lakshman Rekha’ | Exclusive
Karnataka will join the neighbouring state of Tamil Nadu and eastern states of Jharkhand and Bihar in crossing the limit set on the extent of […]