The bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma emphasised that phrases like “with intent to strike terror” and “by any other means of whatever nature to cause or likely to cause” in the UAPA definition reflect the statute’s preventive intent.
Related Posts
LG vs AAP: Delhi CM Atishi Reacts, Asks Ed To Make Sanction Copy Public | English News | News18
LG vs AAP: Delhi CM Atishi reacts, asks ED to make sanction copy public.In more trouble for former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, Lieutenant Governor […]
Light Rain, Dense Fog In Parts Of Delhi, Minimum Temperature Settles At 9.2°C
Delhi experienced light drizzle and fog in some parts on Monday morning, with a minimum temperature of 9.2°C. The IMD had forecasted cloudy skies and […]
Dalit Security Guard Beaten To Death In Ayodhya
Kumar was beaten using iron rods and sticks.