The registry claimed that the name was accepted “in error” and was subject to objections under Sections 9 and 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Related Posts
Chemist Lobby Calls Govt’s Rule On Displaying Drug Prices ‘Impractical’, Suggests App Over Paper-Based Lists
- Bharat Tezz
- February 19, 2025
- 0
The association has claimed that in India, no one has the complete list of brands available in the country, and questioned the logic behind printing […]
Woman, 60, Found Dead In Mumbai Hotel Where She Spent Two Weeks
- Bharat Tezz
- January 21, 2025
- 0
Vinauti Mehtan’s body was found on Sunday afternoon, the Marine Drive police station official said.
EAM S Jaishankar’s Brief Response On China-India Disengagement Process | China News | India | News18
: : EAM S Jaishankar speaks in the Lok Sabha; gives detailed response on India-China disengagement processAIMIM Chief Asaduddin Owaisi asks questions on Nepal currency […]