A SC bench sought a clarification on the criteria for termination, questioning the assessment of the woman judicial officer that had ignored the mental and physical trauma endured by her due to the miscarriage
Related Posts
‘Heavy Rush’ At New Delhi Railway Station But ‘No Stampede’: Railway Officials
According to the police, there was an extra rush at platform numbers 12 and 13 due to delay departure of a few trains.
Evidence Obtained Without Spouse’s Consent Inadmissible: Madras HC
“Spouses must have implicit and total faith in each other. Snooping destroys the fabric of marital life,” said the court
‘Only Enforced 5 Out Of 95 Times Needed’: CAG Calls AAP’s Odd-Even Scheme In Delhi ‘Half-Hearted Effort’
The CAG report, made public on Tuesday, said that the audit observed that from January 2017 to March 2020, there were 95 occasions where these […]