The bench of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma emphasised that phrases like “with intent to strike terror” and “by any other means of whatever nature to cause or likely to cause” in the UAPA definition reflect the statute’s preventive intent.
Related Posts
Garba Event ‘Running for 35 Years’ Cancelled in Indore After Objections from Bajrang Dal
Bajrang Dal and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad have alleged that the garba event promotes so-called ‘love jihad’. Firoz Khan, one of the organisers, offered to […]
Trump Tariffs | Indian Investors In Trouble As Trump Tariffs Causes Stock Market To Crash | News18
| Stock market crash due to Trump’s Tariff move: What should Indian investors do? n18oc_india News18 Mobile App – https://onelink.to/desc-youtube
On Women’s Day, PM Modi Holds Boardroom-Style Interaction With ‘Lakhpati Didis’ In Gujarat | Watch
PM Modi also attended the ‘Lakhpati Didi’ programme in Navsari earlier today, during the second day of his Gujarat visit, where he lauded the role […]